Home Current issue Ahead of print Search About us Editorial board Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 46
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 131-135

Estimation of the inflammatory burden and its impact after treatment in periodontally affected pre- and postmenopausal women


Department of Periodontics, Panineeya Institute of Dental Sciences Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Date of Submission14-Apr-2022
Date of Decision26-May-2022
Date of Acceptance03-Jun-2022
Date of Web Publication01-Jul-2022

Correspondence Address:
Jammula Surya Prasanna
Department of Periodontics, Panineeya Institute of Dental Sciences Research Centre, Dilsuck Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 060, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jorr.jorr_19_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Context: Menopause, when menstruation ceases, is seen with an overall increase in body response to inflammation. Gingiva is no such exception. Gingival inflammation which leads to periodontitis is a condition, which is severe inflammatory in nature, affecting the tissues surrounding the teeth. If not treated in time apparently tooth loss might take place. Pre- and postmenopausal conditions, more or less are critical for inflammatory changes.
Aims: In this study, among both conditions which one was oppressive and which reciprocated more to scaling was examined.
Settings and Design: This study was a cross-sectional interventional study.
Materials and Methods: Sixty female subjects aged between 40 and 50 years with periodontitis were recruited. These were meticulously examined by a gynecologist and equated into two groups of 30 patients each, Group I – premenopausal and Group II – postmenopausal women. Plaque index, periodontal index (PDI), and sulcular bleeding index were compared at baseline and 3 months after scaling.
Statistical Analysis Used: IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 software was used. An independent sample t-test was applied for percentage decrement and intergroup comparison and paired t-test for intergroup comparisons.
Results: Reduction was significant in all the above parameters in both the groups noted on intragroup comparison from baseline to 3 months (P < 0.001). However, the intergroup showed no significance except PDI at baseline.
Conclusions: There was a remarkable effect of scaling on inflammatory conditions such as menopause and periodontitis. In the premenopausal stage only, if women undergo periodontal therapy, it can prevent future aggressive inflammatory changes in the postmenopausal stage.

Keywords: Gingivitis, inflammation, menopause, periodontitis, scaling


How to cite this article:
Prasanna JS, Chinta S. Estimation of the inflammatory burden and its impact after treatment in periodontally affected pre- and postmenopausal women. J Oral Res Rev 2022;14:131-5

How to cite this URL:
Prasanna JS, Chinta S. Estimation of the inflammatory burden and its impact after treatment in periodontally affected pre- and postmenopausal women. J Oral Res Rev [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 16];14:131-5. Available from: https://www.jorr.org/text.asp?2022/14/2/131/349704




  Introduction Top


The menopausal transition leading to postmenopause is not a disease or disorder, but a natural process, as a result of the diminution of ovarian reserves due to aging. Even though it is a natural process, it influences systemic and oral health manifestations. As a sequel of menopause, salivary flow as well as sex steroidal hormones dwindles slowly and eventually affects the periodontal and other oral structures leading to chronic inflammation of the gingiva concurrently ended up with periodontitis.[1]

Gingivitis is a nondestructive type of periodontal disease that commonly occurs due to the accumulation of bacterial plaque in and around the teeth. This is characterized by the propensity of bleeding on provocation. If it is not attended in the early stages it might turn out to be an advanced stage called periodontitis, which is typically characterized by destruction of underlying connective tissue and bone loss ultimately, leading to tooth loss.[2] Conjointly along with plaque many other factors also influence the provocation of the inflammation; depletion of hormonal balance in menopause state is one among them.[3]

Several studies reported that an interlink existed between menopause and increased inflammation and progression of bone loss.[4],[5] Few more studies explored the difference in the intensity of inflammation in pre- and postmenopause.[6],[7] To substantiate this statement, some studies specified that resolution of the gingival inflammation was seen after scaling.[2],[8] However, the opinions are still in dilemma. The formulated hypothesis of this study was the severity of inflammation and its response to treatment might be the same or no change in both groups. Hence, the current study was aimed to assess the severity of inflammation in both pre- and postmenopausal women with periodontitis by comparing periodontal and bleeding indices along with pre- and postoperative responses to treatment.


  Materials and Methods Top


This cross-sectional study was conducted in the department of periodontology. Sixty female subjects aged between 40 and 50 years were examined in this study. The sample size was predicted by setting α value at 0.05 and power to 80% (1−β = 0.8). The lowest sample size recommended for this was 46. To make the results of this pioneer research stable, we increased the sample size to 60. All these patients meeting the selection criteria were sequentially recruited from January 2019 to August 2019, and this is a 3-month follow-up study. The study design was explained to all the subjects and obtained informed consent before the procedure was carried out. The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki[9] consonance was followed throughout the study. Prior approval was taken for this study from the Institutional Ethical Committee (No. 0006) and also registered under clinical trial (https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02357745). The complete study was executed by a single physician. Patients are categorized into two groups after confirming the menstrual status by a gynecologist. Periodontitis patients were enlisted based on the 2017 American Academy of Periodontology classification.[10] Fulfilling all criteria, allotted subjects were categorized into two groups, 30 in each group. Group I – 30 premenopausal women with chronic Periodontitis (PD) and Group II – 30 postmenopausal women with chronic PD.

Inclusion criteria include (1) subjects with chronic moderate periodontitis pocket depth ≥4 mm or loss of attachment ≥3 mm, (2) minimum of 15 natural teeth remaining. (3) nonsmokers, (4) naturally occurred menopausal stage women were only considered, and (5) systemically healthy from preceding 6 months. Exclusion criteria include (1) present or past smokers, (2) oral pathological conditions or tumors, (3) patients on long-term steroid medication and if using any other medications for any other systemic diseases, (4) subjected to hormone replacement therapy, (5) patients who underwent any dental treatment in the past 6 months, and (6) any systemic conditions or any medications that affect the periodontal status were eliminated from the study. A total of 60 patients were examined at baseline and 3-month interval before and after scaling to compare the indices, plaque index (PI),[11] periodontal index (PDI),[11] and sulcular bleeding index (SBI).[12] The University of North Carolina-15 probe (UNC-15, Hu-Friedy, USA) was used for measurements. Patient selection criteria were explained in [Figure 1]. Strict instructions were given not to rinse with mouthwash on the day of examination. The primary outcome measured was inflammatory changes by SBI and the secondary outcome measured was plaque and periodontitis changes.
Figure 1: Selection criteria of patients and study design

Click here to view



  Results Top


Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics version 21, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) version 21 software was used for statistics. Intergroup correlation and percentage reduction were done by an independent sample t-test and paired t-test for intragroup. P < 0.05 is considered to be statistically significant. The group (intra) correlation has shown a significant P value (P < 0.001) in both groups in all parameters. The mean values of PDI, PI, and SBI in the premenopausal groups at baseline were 6.08 ± 0.46, 1.86 ± 0.24, and 3.01 ± 0.27 and for postmenopause 5.68 ± 0.64, 1.84 ± 0.17, and 3.01 ± 0.21, respectively. At 3 months, premenopause values were 2.55 ± 0.12, 1.86 ± 0.24, and 1.21 ± 0.13 and postmenopause values were 2.53 ± 0.13, 0.91 ± 0.13, and 1.21 ± 0.13, respectively [Table 1]. When we compared the changes from baseline to 3 months in both the groups only PDI has shown a significant reduction from premenopause 3.53 ± 0.46 to postmenopause 3.14 ± 0.64 and the significant reduction was 0.009 [Table 2] and [Graph 1].
Table 1: Intragroup comparison at baseline and 3 months

Click here to view
Table 2: Changes from baseline to 3 months in both the groups (inter)

Click here to view




  Discussion Top


Every woman experiences definite hormonal disproportion in life starting from puberty to menopause. This is a turning point for physical, emotional, and psychological changes in a woman's life where the activity of the ovarian follicle is ceased resulting in hormonal deficiency which leads to various systemic diseases apart from vascular diseases. Recent studies have shown to have a positive correlation between menopause with inflammation due to an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor α. Concurrently, anti-inflammatory cytokines are immunoregulatory molecules that control pro-inflammatory cytokine response and activity, but the relationship of these cytokines with menopause is not yet clearly understood.[7],[13]

Menopause affects one's physical condition, particularly the condition of the oral cavity. Many inflammatory changes occur in the oral cavity; periodontitis is one among them and is a very severe form of the inflammatory condition. The incidence increases with age. This could be due to the biological and hormonal changes that occur in the body. Sex steroid hormones play a lead role in affecting the immune system, making individuals susceptible to periodontitis. Research has proven that these variations are more severe in the premenopausal stage than postmenopause.[14] Hormone deficiencies in menopause stage worsen the clinical signs and symptoms of gingiva such as thinning of gingival epithelium, atrophic, and inflammatory changes which lead to bleeding of the gingiva. The severity increases with alteration in the salivary flow rate.[15]

There is a downturn in estrogen secretion triggering inflammation during menopausal transitional stages. Due to this process, pro-inflammatory cytokines increases in number in view of this further diminution of physical functions. Periodontium is composed of high expression of estrogen receptors. Thus, pre- and postmenopausal hormonal inequality significantly affects the periodontium.[16] Estrogen insufficiencies directly hamper the osteoclastic activity which is further responsible for the reduction of bone height in postmenopausal women.[17],[18]

In our study within the groups (intra), comparison found statistically significant results in all the parameters from baseline to 3 months in both the groups. PDI, PI, and SBI all three parameters showed significant values of P < 0.001. However, when we compared among pre- and postmenopausal groups (inter), only PDI showed significant results of 0.007 only at baseline, but at 3 months, it was not significant. Change from baseline to 3 months in between groups also only PDI showed significant correlation 0.009. The remaining two parameters PI and SBI have no significant correlation. This indicates that periodontitis was in a severe form in premenopause compared to postmenopause. Many studies had correlated inflammatory markers in pre- and postmenopausal conditions, but none of the studies were correlated with these clinical parameters with periodontitis.

These study results were consistent with the study done by Alves et al.,[4] intergroup comparison for PI had shown a nonsignificant difference (P > 0.376), indicating that menopause does not have any direct correlation with plaque formation. These results were also analogs to the study by Alves et al.;[4] intergroup comparisons for the gingival index had also shown an insignificant difference (P > 0.161). In our study also, SBI was not significant. When compared to inflammatory cytokines in between menopause stages, there was a difference between pre- and postmenopause.[7] Even though the systemic inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory markers differ in pre- and postmenopause, in this study sulcus bleeding index was not significant, it might be due to the systemic cytokine changes not that as influential as local factors on gingival bleeding. The systemic influence of menopause might be masked up due to the persuasive effect of the local factors. Not much literature is available pertaining to the current study, hence unable to provide adequate references.

Limitations of this study, menopause duration was not standardized.

This study concluded that there is a correlation between menopause and periodontitis, but the underlying mechanism was still unclear. Conflict of opinions exists about the relationship. Findings of our study suggested that when we compared periodontal parameters such as PDI, PI, and SBI in pre- and postmenopausal women significant variations divulged from baseline to 3 months after scaling. However, compared between the two groups, only PDI showed significance from baseline to three months, and PI and SBI had no significance. Suggested that menopause has no correlation with plaque formation and sulcus bleeding. Furthermore, indicating that periodontitis is significantly more in the premenopause group. Due to a multitude of risk factors involved, it is very difficult to establish the correlation between these two conditions. Further longitudinal studies with molecular correlation might strengthen the study.

Ethical clearance

Prior approval was taken for this study from the Institutional Ethical Committee (No. 0006) and also registered under clinical trial (https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02357745).

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank to Rekharani K for proofreading and the gynecologists who were helping us to complete the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Hariri R, Alzoubi EE. Oral manifestations of menopause. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther 2017;7:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Prasanna JS, Sumadhura C, Karunakar P. A comparative analysis of pre- and postmenopausal females with periodontitis and its response to a non invasive clinical approach. J Menopausal Med 2017;23:202-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Prasanna JS, Sumadhura C, Karunakar P, Rekharani K, Himabindu G, Manasa A. Correlative analysis of plasma and urine neopterin levels in the pre- and post-menopausal women with periodontitis, following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2017;21:276-84.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Alves RC, Félix SA, Rodriguez-Archilla A, Oliveira P, Brito J, Dos Santos JM. Relationship between menopause and periodontal disease: A cross-sectional study in a Portuguese population. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:11412-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Singh A, Sharma RK, Siwach RC, Tewari S, Narula SC. Association of bone mineral density with periodontal status in postmenopausal women. J Investig Clin Dent 2014;5:275-82.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Babür C, Ozcan G, Cebi DU, Pervane B, Ozdemir B, Yücel A, et al. Gingival crevicular fluid levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with or without chronic periodontitis. J Dent 2012;40:364-71.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Malutan AM, Dan M, Nicolae C, Carmen M. Proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine changes related to menopause. Prz Menopauzalny 2014;13:162-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sumadhura C, Prasanna JS, Sindhura C, Karunakar P. Evaluation of periodontal response to nonsurgical therapy in pre- and post-menopausal women with periodontitis. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29:298-302.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
General Assembly of the World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent 2014;81:14-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, Chapple IL, Jepsen S, Kornman KS, et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions – Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Periodontol 2018;89 Suppl 1:S1-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Dhingra K, Vandana KL. Indices for measuring periodontitis: A literature review. Int Dent J 2011;61:76-84.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Newbrun E. Indices to measure gingival bleeding. J Periodontol 1996;67:555-61.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Al-Daghri NM, Aziz I, Yakout S, Aljohani NJ, Al-Saleh Y, Amer OE, et al. Inflammation as a contributing factor among postmenopausal Saudi women with osteoporosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e5780.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bechlioulis A, Naka KK, Kalantaridou SN, Kaponis A, Papanikolaou O, Vezyraki P, et al. Increased vascular inflammation in early menopausal women is associated with hot flush severity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E760-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Lee Y, Kim I, Song J, Hwang KG, Choi B, Hwang SS. The relationship between hormone replacement therapy and periodontal disease in postmenopausal women: A cross-sectional study the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2007 to 2012. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:151.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mariotti A, Mawhinney M. Endocrinology of sex steroid hormones and cell dynamics in the periodontium. Periodontol 2000 2013;61:69-88.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Teitelbaum SL. Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 2000;289:1504-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Collins FL, Stone MD, Turton J, McCabe LR, Wang EC, Williams AS. Oestrogen-deficiency induces bone loss by modulating CD14+monocyte and CD4+T cell DR3 expression and serum TL1A levels. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:326.  Back to cited text no. 18
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed138    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]